Comment on Exclusive: jury in anti-genocide activist 'terrorism' trial 'told to ignore international law'
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 day ago
International law guarantees an unequivocal right of resistance, including armed resistance, to people under illegal occupation. Legal experts say that UK terrorism legislation breaches international law by blocking this right.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 day ago
However the jury are not sitting in an international court so that’s beyond their remit.
RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 day ago
A jury’s remit is whatever the jury decides is it’s remit.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 day ago
That’s not how it works.
essell@lemmy.world 1 day ago
With right wing nutters trying to undermine the rule of law all over the place, I feel like stuff like this isn’t helping.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I tried googling if you all have jury nullification, but just got AI slop and stuff about America…
The most I know about the UK legal system is the cool wigs, and what I learned from Sherlock and Misfits.
But I’d assume a jury can do whatever they want. As long as you’re not self snitching, you don’t have to explain anything. And we’re talking about government support of an ongoing genocide, it’s hard to expect jurours to solely follow the letter of the law.
RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 day ago
We do en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification#England_…
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Damn, that shits crazy:
No wonder that dude founded Pennsylvania
grue@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You can’t not have jury nullification without destroying the right to trial by jury. Either the jury has the power to decide or it doesn’t.
astutemural@midwest.social 1 day ago
Everything is within your remit. Fuck anyone who tells you otherwise.