The article is from Bloomberg, whose existence is predicated on housing as financial instrument, while China isn’t. The reason they’re always wrong about China is because being right would put them in a bind.
And it definitely effects a large number of Chinese people of the middle class, just like you and me.
Won’t somebody please think of the petite bourgeoisie!
Even if we accept your presumption that we’re all “middle class” they’re still not just like you and me, because they live in China, and we don’t. We live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie[1][2]; they don’t. We have to be born with a silver spoon or get very lucky or hustle like hell until we’ve gathered a large enough nest egg (a.k.a. private property) to be able to live off of the proceeds in order to retire; they don’t.
Have you considered that corporate social media might be more your speed? Their algorithms are sure to boost your message.
frisbird@lemmy.ml 22 hours ago
Perhaps you don’t understand what the word means.
The commenter said this only effects speculators.
You replied with:
That’s speculation. Investing with the hope of a big pay out is the definition of speculation. Yes, ordinary Chinese people can be speculators. Do you think speculators are not ordinary people?