Of course they will never define “fluent”. They can’t do that because then they’d be proven as lying hacks, or else setting a low bar that was met several years ago.
Of course they will never define “fluent”. They can’t do that because then they’d be proven as lying hacks, or else setting a low bar that was met several years ago.
Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 weeks ago
Fluent seems weaker than valid, which is weaker than sound, philosophically speaking.
It’s like a 2 year old.