Comment

Comment on When "AI" content becomes indistinguishable from human-made content, is there, philosophically speaking, any meaningful differences between the two?

<- View Parent

DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

There is no practical difference. We’re seeing that right now with AI generated music.

Last night, some account spammed multiple communities and they got upvoted and some users replied, apparantly didn’t realize it was a LLM bot (like 20 posts within a few hours, un-human). I also didn’t notice at first glance, now I kinda feel like shit for even responding lmao. 2026 is gonna be even more cooked.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Yeah man, were rapidly approaching a point where society is “post-evidence”. Seeing isn’t believing anymore and a very large chunk of our society is built on the idea of proving things with audio/photo/video based evidence. I fear that our systems aren’t protected against the volume and physical accuracy of what’s becoming increasingly arbitrary to generate at home and at scale.

The legal system has some standards for evidence, but public discourse certainly doesn’t.

source