My understanding is that it’s for learning only. You should be safe for your private singing purposes. It seems like you would own them royalties if you created your own song lyrics, after having read/heard one of theirs…
Comment on German court: ChatGPT violated copyright law by ‘learning’ from song lyrics
melonhusk@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
So, if my brain ‘ingested’ a song lyric and now I can sing it, does that mean I owe GEMA royalties every time I hum in the shower? asking for a friend. who is me. my friend is me.
saroh@lemmy.world 2 days ago
jmbreuer@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
They sure would like that.
Never thought I’d hail the GEMA for what they’re doing…
frongt@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Unless you are performing it for others, or for profit, they generally don’t care.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
What if you read a copyrighted engineering textbook, and then build something for profit with that knowledge?
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 2 days ago
GEMA stands for “Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte” which means “Society for Musical Performing and Mechanical Reproduction Rights” in English. So if it’s not music they won’t care
masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
But the court rulings / precedence wouldn’t care about that distinction, it just covers learning from copyrighted material in general.
frongt@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
That’s the point of a textbook.