Yeah, the malicious compliance was what should have been regulated instead. Ban the annoying cookie popup and require sites to make it opt-in by default. At most, sites should be allowed to have an option in a burger menu to allow cookies, and clicking that button would open the popup to specify which cookies you wanted to allow.
Comment on Surprise EU rollback of 'GDPR' digital-rights rules prompts alarm
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 days agoIt’s different groups of people with different interests.
Also doesn’t help that the cookie banners were a kind of malicious compliance. They were made deliberately difficult to navigate around when you didn’t immediate hit “accept everything unequivocally”.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
Yeah; the response should be that a “reject all” button must be displayed next to the accept all button with equal prominence, and define prominence to mean the same size, with similar contrast to the accept all button and clearly labelled.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I’ll do you one better. “Websites should default to the minimal cookies option, with settings confined to a website option menu that does not occlude the entrance page.”
gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 days ago
I think a better way might be that browsers can auto-decline all cookies.