So you admit, I’m right, but you’re still arguing against me and then how a false equivalence in to top it off. How the fuck does that make any sense? Lmao
Yeah, it’s very clear that your argument is a false equivalence because you’re ignoring the massive differences between the different types of planes and the different safety records between them. And there’s lots of things to suggest that, you’re just ignoring them.
FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 year ago
The risk increases with any aircraft, the size is irrelevant. You might as well complain whenever Boeing sells a new airplane.
Fortunately, the ATC regulates the number of aircraft - of any size - that can safely fly in a particular section of airspace.
gregorum@lemm.ee 1 year ago
So you admit, I’m right, but you’re still arguing against me and then how a false equivalence in to top it off. How the fuck does that make any sense? Lmao
FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 year ago
I’m arguing that building these planes is no worse than building any other plane.
And there is nothing to suggest that air travel is currently unsafe due to congestion, if anything air travel is decreased from previous years.
gregorum@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yeah, it’s very clear that your argument is a false equivalence because you’re ignoring the massive differences between the different types of planes and the different safety records between them. And there’s lots of things to suggest that, you’re just ignoring them.