Comment on The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"

• Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Literally promoting phrenology.

  That’s why I said this article was subpar. And I even commented on this in pretty harsh terms:

  the regime members are really busy doing their best to make a new metaphorical rope

  I don’t agree with a lot of what they say, but I don’t believe they are malicious, at least to the extent that many American news sources are.

  source
• Maeve@kbin.earth ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Plus the post filled with buzzwords that superficially sound smart strung together in a way that say nothing of value.

  source