A cursory search lead to this thread from 2024 community.bitwarden.com/t/…/74800
where an employee stated
I’ll note that policy wise nothing changed. The referenced issue is a packaging bug, but the goal still is the dual licensing model, with the core being open source, and some (mostly enterprise) features being source-available.
Both the client and server are mostly open source. Some server features are paywalled. The alternative Vaultwarden server is fully open source, and much lighter on system resources.
Have there been any recent licensing shenanigans with BitWarden?
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Vaultwarden (the free server implementation) also supports passkeys.