Comment on Mathematics disproves Matrix theory, says reality isn’t simulation
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 week agoNone of what you’ve said ameliorates the faulty logic I highlighted. You have instead just added more assumptions.
Comment on Mathematics disproves Matrix theory, says reality isn’t simulation
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 week agoNone of what you’ve said ameliorates the faulty logic I highlighted. You have instead just added more assumptions.
survirtual@lemmy.world 1 week ago
The logic is not faulty, it is predicated upon conditional statements. It is actually a synthesis of Bostrom’s trilemma, Zuse/Fredkin digital ontology, Dyson/Fermi cosmological reasoning, and extrapolation from current computational capabilities.
The “holes” are epistemic, not logical.
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Okay, if you prefer to frame the flaws in your reasoning like that, then I’m happy to do so. That doesn’t make the conclusion less flawed. The conversation isn’t about the hows and whyfores of formal logic, it’s about whether the conclusion is likely to be true.
survirtual@lemmy.world 1 week ago
From my perspective it is 100% true as I have seen the other side. Having the conclusion known gives a small advantage in forming the logic to get there.
SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Yeah, that took a turn