I’ve never heard of that before… and Google shows zero results for “states with two party consent for video recording” all links are for audio…
Just because you’re wrong and got called out doesn’t mean the other person is being aggressive lmfao.
I’ve never heard of that before… and Google shows zero results for “states with two party consent for video recording” all links are for audio…
Just because you’re wrong and got called out doesn’t mean the other person is being aggressive lmfao.
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Right because a quick google search makes you a legal expert…
For real chill.
plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Is it so odd, that someone knows how to read and understand code and law books? It’s part of any tradesperson training.
I know it’s not a thing, from plenty of research into my own camera systems, and I am confident that I know the results I found are correct, because I know how to understand code and law books.
And no it doesn’t, but the lack of any results shows that you’re full of fucking shit.
Again, just because someone swears doesn’t mean they are being aggressive! It’s common repertoire for a lot of working people! Sorry princess!
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I am a compliance expert. I too am confident in my assessment of the legal situation.
I am officially tagging you as a troll and moving on with my life. You seriously need to learn to chill.
plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Yet you claim there is two party consent for video, won’t provide anything to support that claim, and the one link you did specifically says it doesn’t…
People can be confidently wrong, like in this case…
Awwwwhhh I upset muffin by using logic and reason to refute them.
Image