Comment on ‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day agoWhat are you talking about?
I’m saying that the parts of infrastructure needed to accept a message to the service from the client application, encrypted or not, associated to a user or not, are under same requirements for Signal and Telegram.
I don’t know if you understand that every big service is basically its own 90s’ Internet self-contained, and what accepts your messages is pretty similar to an SMTP server in their architecture.