Comment on ‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 12 hours agoIt’s weird for Signal to not be able to do what Telegram does. Yes, for this particular purpose they are not different.
blah3166@piefed.social 11 hours ago
Telegram is basically not even encrypted. They are not offering the same service.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 11 hours ago
For the purpose of “shoot a message, go offline and be certain it’s sent” it’s the same service.
blah3166@piefed.social 2 hours ago
If sending a message is the only requirement, email fits the bill and has worked for half a century. If we’re being real, the reason Signal “can’t do what Telegram does” is because Telegram doesn’t even attempt to do what Signal does. Signal is tackling a much bigger problem.