Comment on Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands

floofloof@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• cecilkorik@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  If an option exists that nobody should ever choose, why is it an option? In what situation would this option ever make sense?

  source

  • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    In a situation where someone doesn’t understand the implications and a corporation can make money of their misfortune. That pretty much describes most of social media.

    source

    • Taco2112@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Love this bit

      But there is something different and unsettling here: It’s people being able to use my face (easily) to create content for potential sexual gratification without my consent.

      But she did consent when she allowed people to use her face. I’m not saying what those people are doing with it are morally right but she consented when she clicked the box allowing cameos.

      source

      • missingno@fedia.io ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        As a journalist she did it to see what would happen. And then wrote an article about what happened. This is definitely worth talking about even if she did click the box, the box isn't really the point here.

        source
      • balsoft@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        She consented to something but didn’t consider/understand what that something implies. While it might be obvious for terminally online people, most people don’t expect “cameos” to necessarily mean “fetish porn cameos”.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • squaresinger@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

        The question is what did she consent to (as in, what was the thing she did expect that this checkbox created)?

        “Cameo” doesn’t exactly evoke “allow people to create fetish porn with my face”.

        If the button was labelled with that or some other more clear text, I don’t think there would have been a need for this article.

        And that’s pretty much the point of this article: “Beware of corporate double-speek, this harmless word here means ‘allow fetish porn with your face’”, and that kind of warning article is not only important but pretty much essential in today’s world, where “autopilot” doesn’t mean that the car is fully self-driving, and where even “full self-driving” doesn’t mean “fully self-driving”.

        As Marc-Uwe Kling said: “Die Welt ist voll von Arschlöchern. Rechtlich abgesicherten Arschlöchern.”

        “The world is full of assholes. Legally protected assholes.”

        source
  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Plausible deniability? Nobody will be able to prove any video of you is real.

    source