Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants

• 3abas@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  The license behind it is not mention anywhere.

  Are you lost? The overall discussion is people freaking out about FUTO’s license, that’s why this thread was made, that’s why people are upset with FUTO, that’s why they are accusing FUTO of being a capitalist corporation that wants to ruin open source, and that’s why they’re talking about backdoors being introduced to immich because it’s now under FUTO.

  I’m not combative, you have a bone to pick with FUTO and are making up excuses to complain.

  I simply agreed with you and explained why people are freaking out about FUTO: lack of understanding and mob mentality because of an article that says they’re bad.

  I don’t have a bone to pick with FUTO, I’m simply saying people are freaking out about FUTO’s license and making up weird scenarios for what can happen to the software if it’s under FUTO because of lack of understanding. I highlighted what I think is good and bad about FUTO’s license because I seemed relevant to the discussion in the thread.

  I’m agreeing with you. Immich’s source is available and REGARDLESS OF ITS LICENSE, whether it’s Open Source or Source First, you can literally see that it has no backdoors and compile it yourself.

  You are being combative, and in a very weird way.

  source

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    You haven’t agreed with me, you have started talking about FUTO license which I haven’t mentioned, nor the person I was replying to.

    You’re projecting a reasoning behind peoples words which isn’t there and are defensive when people don’t agree with you.

    source
  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    The overall discussion is about FUTO, sort of, but this particular subthread is about Immich. If you want to discuss FUTO itself and their license, move to one of the subthreads about that.

    source