Comment on Tories and Local Governments Refuse To Approve More Homes
Emperor@feddit.uk 1 year agoDunno, struck me as weird like those groups you stumble on.that turn out to be astroturf organisations. However, I can’t figure out quite how their angle benefits Big Business. However, as you suggest it could be those behind the pension Ponzi schemes.
merridew@feddit.uk 1 year ago
They have a bunch of stuff about “promoting fertility”, eg
which all sounds lovely and idyllic, but in reality the far-right government in Hungary has been throttling access to abortion with new legislation that is
meaning that
theguardian.com/…/hungary-tightens-abortion-acces…
I can’t definitely figure out the angle either. But they are a pro-fertility organisation praising a far-right regime that is implementing regressive “pro-life” policies at the expense of women’s rights, and they are very careful not to highlight the true nature of these policies on their website.
They’re also headquartered in Texas. So… draw your own conclusions.
Emperor@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Yeah, that was where my mind was going.
To stop population decline you really need to go full Catholic on birth control and abortion.
And to what end?
Israel’s aim seems simple: they are fighting a demographic war with the Palestinians and the more people they have the quicker they can fill up the Occupied Territories.
Beyond that rather specific case you can only extrapolate but population decline means you need more immigrants to fill the roles young people would do and that plays into ideas of the Great Replacement.
That might be going too far and impugning their motivation but if you are praising Hungary’s reactionary policies then something is not right. Even if they are themselves doing this for the purest motives, they’ve rather quickly picked up some unsavoury fellow travellers.
tintory@lemm.ee 1 year ago
On the other hand, they are explicity focusing on the increase in social benefits, not anything dealing with anti-choice elements, and praised American Democrats for expanding Paid Leave and Unemployment, not to mention you guys left out this quote
If this was a right wing rag, then they would focus on culture or other nonsensical dogwhistles, but they are clearly hostile towards the right but willing to give praise to anyone who increase social spending
merridew@feddit.uk 1 year ago
You can increase social spending and still have contempt for women’s right to bodily autonomy. The two don’t go automatically hand in hand.
tintory@lemm.ee 1 year ago
You forget this part from the same article, which changes the context quite a bit
merridew@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Not really. If your goal is to undo “retreating state support,” you can do that without praising far-right regimes aiming to restrict women’s rights to bodily autonomy.
The fact that they gloss over that little aspect is suspicious.
Their website is conspicuously opaque regarding its funding, and “stop population decline” is curiously close to (but notably more palatable than) the 14 Words, while still acting as an effective dog-whistle for people familiar with those words.
tintory@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Might be? The site itself has attacked Elon Musk and Peter Thiel (stoppopulationdecline.org/silicon-valley-pronatal…) , so it’s probably not funded by them. It also praises WFH, Paid Leave, Unions at the like, which makes it less likely its funded by the right.