I don’t get how the articles “back you up” in this point
You’re almost insisting on talking to the people on a situation you know might negatively affect them and where they are stuck in the situation and that just seems odd.
What do the articles have to do with that?
jve@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
That’s because you haven’t read them.
They have to do with the positive outcomes, which you continue to ignore, or treat as inconsequential.
A small chance of a negative outcome does not generally outweigh a good chance of a positive outcome.
You insist on mischaracterizing my position. Asking somebody a question ir two is hardly as insisant as you keep making it out to be.
To you
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 22 hours ago
So you’re just gambling on their feelings, did I understand that correctly?
jve@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
I suppose so.
And you have no notion about gambling theory whatsoever? Am I inferring that correctly?
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 21 hours ago
I don’t want to make anyone’s day worse. Gambling on someone else’s feelings just seems icky to me.