Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors
DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 2 days agoOne would think that leftists, socialists, communists, tankies, and/or others would come up with supplementary wikis such as Conservapedia or RationalWiki that are good.
and, FWIW:
Category:Wikidebates
en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Wikidebates
e.g.
Is capitalism sustainable?
en.wikiversity.org/…/Is_capitalism_sustainable%3F
It’s sad how little news there is relatively little news in Wikinews ( en.wikinews.org/wiki/Main_Page ).
Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 2 days ago
We have them, e.g. ProleWiki, but good luck trying to explain to the average western Wikipedia user that for certain geopolitical topics they might be worth checking out and contrasted with Wikipedia. My problem isn’t the lack of alternatives, my problem is the anticommunist and pro-western bias in Wikipedia in geopolitically charged topics.
DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Hmmm,
Let’s see:
pw:Wikipedia
Wow. 😁🙂
and while I’m at it:
cp:Wikipedia
pw:Communist Party of Peru – Shining Path
and I suppose the supplements are a way, however the effectiveness/ineffectiveness.
Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 2 days ago
You may disagree with the first statement on being an imperialist propaganda outlet, but the rest of information is relevant.
I don’t get your point of posting the article on the Shining Path, though