Comment on Republican? Democrat? There is a third option:
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoCaptain, the goalpost is running away!
Small Dollar donations mean individuals, like when a granny gives $15 to Bernie Sanders. Since that explicitly says public financing that means it would have an upper limit allotted to everhly candidate.
It says businesses and corporations won’t be allowed to donate to campaigns or collaborate with campaigns. That leaves a loophole where they can still endorse a candidate publicly, but taking that away would be a violation of freedom of speech.
PACs will still exist in the sense that political advocates and lobbies exist, but they would be severely gutted by not being able to fund campaigns, which is their sole purpose since the Citizens United decision was first handed down.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I’m consistently defending the statement that the Democrats (and the Republicans) DO NOT want to remove money from politics.
They may be arguing for more transparency, but they definitely are not asking for less lovely money. increase expenditure
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The fact that you can see that graph and not realize the impact of Citizens United court decision has, that the DNC consistently campaigned on reversing, is astonishing. It’s like seeing somebody with every piece of the puzzle fail to put it together.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Again. The DNC are campaigning for transparency. Not less money.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
That’s dome extreme cognitive dissonance, bro.