Comment on A cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inman
agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 month agoIf you think that it was an insult then that shows what shame you have for your lack of skill, not an intention on my part.
Comment on A cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inman
agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 month agoIf you think that it was an insult then that shows what shame you have for your lack of skill, not an intention on my part.
FishFace@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Seems like you’re not very skilled at responding meaningfully.
agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well I’m not going to slap you on the back and praise you for saying the equivalent of “I just eat potato chips anyway I don’t care if the new chips are made of styrofoam they still got flavor blasted”.
Also, I totally disagree with you. If I see a neat picture someone took from getting dropped onto earth from low orbit, I’m gonna think that’s way cooler than an ai image trying to emulate the same thing, even if I’m only looking at it for a second. I’m going to think a crudely drawn parody of a meme is funnier than an ai generated imitation of a meme, even if all I’m doing is making that little exhale with the nose instead of laughing.
There’s a difference. You can tell. If you’re so Internet addled you genuinely are saying you don’t think there’s a difference, then you’ve got like, negative skills in art appreciation.