Comment on Why aren't those into bondage and S/M called "leatherosexuals"?
Fondots@lemmy.world 2 days agoFor some it kind of is, the leather subculture is a thing, and needless to say leather is a pretty important part of it.
I am not at all qualified to really go into it too much beyond just pointing out that it exists.
I do have a little anecdote about it though. I know someone who is an all-around very kinky person, into all kinds of fairly extreme bondage stuff. She entered and won some sort of “Ms Leather [city we live in]” competition/pageant thing a few years back but there was a bit of controversy about it because she wasn’t part of the leather subculture, even though there was a pretty decent amount of overlap between her own kinky interests and the leather community, and so she decided to resign her title and apologize over it.
railway692@piefed.zip 2 days ago
Oh, leather is absolutely a thing.
But it’s a subculture of a subculture.
It’s like asking, “Why don’t we call all car drivers Tesla Enthusiasts? Because they sure seem to love them.”