Comment on Google is blocking AI searches for Trump and dementia

Cyberflunk@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I use mojeek, and startpage sometimes. Ddg is too influenced now, they do the same stuff Google does. Brave is run by people who hate LGBT people so I can’t support them in good conscience.

  source

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The post is likely referring to a long-standing controversy around Brendan Eich, the founder and CEO of Brave (the browser and search engine company). In 2008, Eich donated $1,000 to support California's Proposition 8, a ballot measure that banned same-sex marriage (later overturned by courts). This came to light in 2014 when he was briefly appointed CEO of Mozilla, leading to widespread backlash from employees, users, and activists who viewed it as anti-LGBTQ+. Eich resigned from Mozilla after just 11 days amid the outcry, expressing regret for causing pain but not fully recanting his views.
    
    Some people, including in the LGBTQ+ community and allies, continue to avoid or criticize Brave on these grounds, seeing it as support for leadership with historically discriminatory stances. This isn't a "new" issue in 2025—it's tied to events from over a decade ago—but it persists in discussions about ethical tech choices. Brave has faced other unrelated controversies (e.g., ad practices), but this one specifically relates to anti-LGBT perceptions.
    
    For more details:
    - [Wikipedia on Brendan Eich](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich)
    - [Article on the Mozilla controversy](https://www.osnews.com/story/27646/the-new-mozilla-ceos-political-past-is-imperiling-his-present/)
    - [Recent discussion on Brave controversies](https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/1j1pq7b/list_of_brave_browser_controversies/)
    - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43300333
    

    well fuck! brave is the one browser that fits all my needs.

    source
• derpgon@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • vpklotar@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’ve been a Kagi user for over a year and I usually hate AI summaries. Though I must say I love how Kagi has implemented them as it gives sources where it found the info so you can dig deeper and see if what it said was actually correct.

    source

    • droans@midwest.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Kagi’s summaries are great.

      They’re hidden by default, requiring you to click the button first. They don’t extrapolate too much. And their sources will be the exact same links you got from the search.

      source

      • vpklotar@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I just put a question mark at the end and it does it automatically. Works like a charm.

        source
    • derpgon@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Their AI is pretty good, both assistant and search summaries. Been using it extensively as it actually provides correct and objective information (at least more often than others). It is also privacy-first, so you don’t get those annoying personality shifts as with like GPT.

      source