Comment on [deleted]

hddsx@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• Overspark@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Yeah I wouldn’t call Arch a server OS. I run Arch on my laptop, but Debian on my docker/file/self-hosting server. Best tool for the job etc. Never even been tempted by Unraid, the whole point of running Linux is that I control what goes where.

  source

  • refreeze@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Arch on the desktop, Debian on the server is the way to go. Both solid, community (non-corporate) distros that fit each use case.

    source
  • hddsx@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m not sure what the benefits of unraid are but for better or worse, I’ve been running Linux servers since 2007 or so, so……

    I also used arch now and full time for a few years in the 2010s. I like it, but they put in breaking changes occasionally that I don’t want to have to deal with for a server.

    I was on CentOS and switched to Debian because of IBM/RH

    source
• PlexSheep@infosec.pub ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It just works, I love Debian. Never even thought about getting unraid

  source