Comment on Britain jumps into bed with Palantir in £1.5B defense pact
zqps@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks agoAmazing. If you build and sell tools to commit horrible crimes against humanity, that’s all cool, it’s just good business actually as long as someone else is pushing the button.
A kindergardener has more robust ethics than this.
Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 weeks ago
What are the horrible crimes against humanity that make Palantir the most evil company in the world and be specific.
zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Sure, here’s a specific response to your question: I’m not ChatGPT you lazy fuck. And since you proudly do not care, why would I spend any more time on you than to write this comment.
Dirac@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Congratulations, this was the best comment I’ve read all fucking week. 😂
Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 weeks ago
So you have no idea and youre just emotionally reacting to headlines and slop articles.
zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Nice try.
Dirac@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Instead of answering this question, I’ll direct you to some tangential research that may help you answer this question yourself. I’d like you to read a bit on different ethical frameworks (you can just wiki that one), then I’d like you to apply that to some of the openly available policies, contracts and practices of the company. At that point you should have your answer. Thank you in advance for doing your own research 😉
Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 weeks ago
Thanks for letting me know you can’t answer the question at the start
Dirac@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Well let me just ask you a question: how much say should an AI have in the decision to kill a human being? What percentage do you think is appropriate?