I agree. Generally, I think AI is a net negative in any context or scenario, because of the way the tech is built. The badness of AI is inherent, a priori of any copyright discussion. It’s a garbage creator that lowers the overall quality of any mass-data applications, be it aggregation like search engines or Wikipedia, or entertainment media, like photo search results, videos or books.
Comment on Internet Archive’s big battle with music publishers ends in settlement
General_Effort@lemmy.world 22 hours agoIt just seems odd to me, you know? AI in the hands of the few is harmful, but if they pay license fees, that can be allowed. Copyright infringement is theft, but it is acceptable if the result is shared freely. I don’t really see how that works.
RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 7 hours ago
The result isn’t shared freely because the owners get to dictate what information AI is allowed to give and under what context.