Comment on Internet Archive’s big battle with music publishers ends in settlement
lennee@lemmy.world 23 hours agoit can be fair use as long as it is open. OpenAi used to be a non-profit after all. As it stands now they can go fuck themselves as far as im concerned.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Why do you want it to work that way?
lennee@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Cuz AI in the hands of a few is harmful (see elon musks grok and I find it reprehensible to train AI on material that u steal and then paywall the result
General_Effort@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
It just seems odd to me, you know? AI in the hands of the few is harmful, but if they pay license fees, that can be allowed. Copyright infringement is theft, but it is acceptable if the result is shared freely. I don’t really see how that works.
nuggie_ss@lemmings.world 7 hours ago
The result isn’t shared freely because the owners get to dictate what information AI is allowed to give and under what context.
RiverRabbits@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
I agree. Generally, I think AI is a net negative in any context or scenario, because of the way the tech is built. The badness of AI is inherent, a priori of any copyright discussion. It’s a garbage creator that lowers the overall quality of any mass-data applications, be it aggregation like search engines or Wikipedia, or entertainment media, like photo search results, videos or books.