If I got this right you took something I didn’t say as your foundational point to argue against, said that I should say what you want me to say instead to be truthful, and that advocating for intolerance against the intolerant is dumb because you’ve defined it to either include or require political violence.

I guess you get points for boldness, but -10 points from gryphondorf for arguing with yourself.

And to be clear; supporting assassinations & enjoying the poetic justice of someone who advocates for gun violence and that some people should be killed for who they were born as and not their choices getting killed by a gun are not the same thing.