Comment on ClockBench: Even the best AI models can't reliably read the clock

MHLoppy@fedia.io ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Some of those don’t have tick marks. I hate clocks like that, they’re difficult to read.

  I’m surprised it’s near 90, a while generation has grown up with digital clocks everywhere

  source
• CouldntCareBear@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Have a look at the clock faces there using to Benchmark and it’ll make more sense.

  source

  • MHLoppy@fedia.io ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Really wish they published the whole dataset. They don't specify on the page or in the paper what the full set was like, and the GitHub repo only has one of the easy-to-read ones. If >=10% of the set is comprised of clock faces designed not to be readable then fair enough.

    source
• Smith6612@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You’d be surprised. I did a super quick skim of the article, and didn’t see any mention of age group. There’s a lot of talk about how the newer generation of humans struggle to read Analog clocks, because many of them grew up to Digital clocks.

  There are also analog clocks that are just awful to read anyways.

  source