Comment on Where's the Line Between Slut Shaming & Criticizing Promiscuity?
TheMoralNarcissit@hilariouschaos.com 4 days ago
“Is it still valid, then, to bring these things up as negatives?”
Within the meme, it not really explain why any of these things are negative. It just lists things that are suppose to be bad. For an argument to be good it should at least try to explain why promiscuity is bad. And even define what they mean by sexual promiscuity .
It also sates in the meme “submissive can’t cook’, to be honest I think this meme may actually be trying to be offensive . When I hear this statement, it sounds like the man is grumpy that the chick can not cook food for him to consume. There are a few ways to interpret this. One meaning is that the shitposter believes in specialized gender roles. With the males working to bring in an income and being the leader of the household. While the females perform the domestic roles, like cooking, cleaning and shiting out young ones. The idea perhaps in this poster’s view, is that it is better for people to get good and focus on one role, instead of being overwhelmed by many. They may even believe that one sex is more fit to do certain things then others. Another meaning, is the artist is simply a troll trying to get some laughs by pissing off Feminists or really any one who does not believe that woman are inferior (or at the very least believes that woman are rational enough to make decisions effecting themselves or others and do not need a guardian or an owner to take charge). It is also possible that the meme writer is actually a feminist themselves trying to make slut shamers look bad. By having the critic of sexual promiscuity, come off as sexist. They could group the two ideas as one and focus on attacking the less popular idea, with hopes of taking the other one down with it. Or maybe a guy got piss his girlfriend cheated on him, give him monkey pox, keeps blowing weed in his face. And he is hungry too.
Too lazy to answer the other question.
Lovstuhagen@hilariouschaos.com 3 days ago
Sure, the ‘cook’ part was certainly rage baiting the left or sarcasm. But since much of it is valid complaints men have - wanting a woman who has only slept with a few guys and all in understandable situations (long-term relationships and such), is very normal, and so I think someone just inserted rage bait…
TO play devil’s advocate for them… Women would like a guy who si a good cook, too, right. there is nothing inherently wrong with that.
Of course, there are sexist guys who would be like “THE MODERN DIVISION OF LABOR IS ABSURD, you should cook for me, too. When I get home from work, I go on the computer…! You go cook…! You’re the woman…!” And I absolutely think those guys are knucklehead morons, and few of them can actually have a good, long-term relationship.