awful act poorly written, thought through (!) and then implemented
kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Online safety act really does it job euh? /s
3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com 5 days ago
kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Online safety act really does it job euh? /s
awful act poorly written, thought through (!) and then implemented
omcgo@lemmy.world 4 days ago
We have to look at hardware-level solution like VOOP
Guilvareux@feddit.uk 3 days ago
I’ll go against the grain on this one, I actually think something akin to this is the right approach.
“Protect the children” will have to go somewhere, it’s not going to just die. Getting a device with locked down access is better than the ridiculous changes to the internet that are being planned.
This might not be the right implementation, but I think the idea is along the right lines… or at least, the least worst option.
Blemgo@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Though this solution also seems to be very flawed, doesn’t it? You basically trust another company to manage your child’s smartphone and granting it full access to it. Furthermore, that doesn’t stop predators, as they could still arrange meetups with their unknowing victims. And even if it captures text messages, kids would be discouraged to use their phone due to their fear of their parents disproving of their friends or their communication to them. Instead, they’d more likely learn the use of “burner phones” by getting a factory-reset phone and using that one instead.
It’s the sort of ham-fisted attempt expected by parents that blame their kids for their mistakes instead of their parenting.