This is an Apache server version error it takes 5 minutes to fix.
Comment on ICEBlock handled my vulnerability report in the worst possible way
x1gma@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Honestly, apart from the report being potentially wrong, the researcher seems pretty entitled as well. Like good intentions and all that, but he’s given him a week to fix the issue, usual practice in responsible disclosure are 90 days. We’re not talking about a company here, it’s some single random dude providing the app.
This really sounds like some personal issue written down for public drama, while making himself ridiculous for not knowing his own shit properly.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
x1gma@lemmy.world 1 day ago
So fucking what? He is not being paid in any kind, and anything he does on that project is volunteer work. If he was not able to do anything on that project due to regular work, vacation, personal issues, or the simple fact that he didn’t want to?
If you don’t pay for a service, you don’t get to decide what people do, deal with it
Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Well on one hand sure.
On the other hand, detrimental reliance is a tort and if someone is relying on an app for a specific safety function, the app could be civilly liable if it fails it’s function in some way.
Imagine if you had this attitude about an insulin use tracker/calculator, that sometimes gave wildly wrong insulin dose numbers.
Maybe down the road, it’s decided that aiding and abetting ICE is a crime, and providing misinformation intentionally or unintentionally is a criminal act. App developer dude could be criminally liable if he knew or ought to have known he had vulnerabilities. You know, in your New Nuremberg trials that you are going to get sometime in the next decade or so.
That’s not to say the researcher is in the clear, the timeline is too tight for his end of this to be a responsible disclosure.
Without providing more details, I also discovered that his server is running outdated software with known vulnerabilities.
I was intentionally vague because I knew that his server was vulnerable at the time of writing, and I didn’t want anyone to exploit one of these vulnerabilities before he had a chance to fix it.
Also, this is not vague, profiling techniques exist, and it puts a clear target on the iceblock servers.
x1gma@lemmy.world 1 day ago
On the other hand, detrimental reliance is a tort and if someone is relying on an app for a specific safety function, the app could be civilly liable if it fails it’s function in some way.
Yes, if the app would be any kind of official tool.
Imagine if you had this attitude about an insulin use tracker/calculator, that sometimes gave wildly wrong insulin dose numbers.
Yes, and that’s why regulations for those kinds of things exist, that prevent those things. There is no regulation for the ice tracker.
Maybe down the road, it’s decided that aiding and abetting ICE is a crime, and providing misinformation intentionally or unintentionally is a criminal act. App developer dude could be criminally liable if he knew or ought to have known he had vulnerabilities. You know, in your New Nuremberg trials that you are going to get sometime in the next decade or so.
If down the road a regulation would happen for, app developer dude would be forced to either comply or to stop operations.
interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Security researchers feel entitled to use any kind of practice that does not comply with the security best practice homonculus, anyone found in default MUST remedy the situation of discontinue operations immediately, the security researcher has graced the community with his works and now that a flaw has been found it MUST be remedied and the security researcher is to be rewarded and adulated for his diligence and high moral standing !