Comment on Statement on discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol by W3C SocialCG
rimu@crust.piefed.social 1 week agoIt was pretty bizarre how it was published in such a way that it seemed to come from w3c socialcg when really it was just Emelia.
Despite being an activitypub dev I have not seen any of the supposed "heated discussions" probably because I don't spend time on Mastodon trying to boost ATProto. It doesn't seem like a widespread problem to me.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It was signed by a number of people, including OG ActivityPub contributors. I guess you’d have to know what goes on in the mailing list.
Looking around here, there’s a lot of ignorant hostility. I am always surprised by how tech-illiterate fediverse fans are. People who feel that that’s their peer group probably have a hard time ignoring that background toxicity.