Comment

Comment on Google's plan to restrict sideloading on Android has a potential escape hatch for users

Okay, I understand your position. Android’s play store has market dominance, so the a term to distinguish between 99% of play store installs vs others, makes sense.

Now, that is a tangent to the main issue, just arguing semantics. The issue is control versus openness, not about the term sideloading.

Is Google’s plan to restrict app sideloading a good thing in your eyes, or no?

source

Sort:hotnew top

Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

Now, that is a tangent to the main issue

A tangent someone else made. Many others really.

just arguing semantics

100%

Is Google’s plan to restrict app sideloading a good thing in your eyes, or no?

Absolutely not. I will no longer recommend Android to anyone. It’s cooked, as far as I’m concerned.

source
- yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Nice, I could tell you’re a smart dude, so at least we all can agree that Android is no longer to be trusted.
  
  Funny how words and language become the focus of this thread, and then the main issues get pushed to the side. I was arguing against you as if we didn’t agree on the main problem 😅
  
  source
  - Ulrich@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    Words and language are very important sometimes. I just disagree that this is one of those times.
    
    source