Comment on Statement on discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol by W3C SocialCG
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 week ago
People are arguing because ATProto is not open. And that couldn’t be more clear in the simple fact that BSky hosts tens of millions of users, 99.95%, on a single server. While AP has <1% of the number of users and yet they’re strewn across tens of thousands of servers.
We’ve already seen the implications of such closure in the silencing of users by foreign govts, silencing of users in an entire state, and enforcement of draconian ID laws on millions of users in the EU. Meanwhile AP is largely unaffected.
And BSky is still taking the Silicon Valley approach of “we’ll figure out how to make money later”, to which the answers are the same as every other social platform. They’re not funded by donations, they’re funded by investments from investors who expect to see a profit eventually.
Microw@piefed.zip 1 week ago
ATProto is open. Bluesky is not.
What we currently see is similar to how ActivityPub looked when it was first drawn up as a protocol: when 99% of users were on Mastodon GmbH's server.
The ten thousands of servers came later. And in theory ATProto is defined open enough that it is possible to implement it independently from Bluesky.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 week ago
Not a distinction worth making when 99+% are all on the same server.
99% of the 12 users?
Then why is no one doing it?