Comment on France to sue Australian platform Kick for 'negligence' after livestream death
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 days agoGerrymandering in Melbourne also worked against Greens.
Comment on France to sue Australian platform Kick for 'negligence' after livestream death
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 days agoGerrymandering in Melbourne also worked against Greens.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Are you meaning this in a negative way? The seat was reapportioned and as is the Electoral Commission’s guidance on the matter, it was pushed towards as even of a split as possible.
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Maybe it is unfair to call it Gerrymandering but it definitely worked against Greens.
princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
I mean, to call it gerrymandering is valid, but people always tend to use it as a dirty word. Any time people are making the choices about electoral boundaries there’s gerrymandering at play. We just choose in Australia to generally try to make seats as competitive as possible. On the balance of things, Greens-dominant areas in Fitzroy North and Carlton North were also redistributed away from Melbourne to Wills, which meant that Peter Khalil (Labor) had a huge 7.60% swing against him. Samantha Ratnam (Greens) came within 3k votes of winning the seat. This is all coming from a Greens member by the way.
sqgl@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Do you think Greens would have won within the old boundaries? Or would the preferences screwed them anyhow. Speaking of which…
Just to be precise: Greens probably preferenced Labor in the previous election too. The difference this time is that 2PP was between Lab & Grn this time whereas previously it was between Lib & Grn so of course the Kab preferences followed mainly to Greens.
You sound savvy enough to know it but your wording was ambiguous so I just want to make sure a fellow Green is armed with the info.
I no longer vote #1 Greens although they get my vote via preferences. A few of my friends have followed suit. Their support of the Digital Identity Bill was a sellout and their lack of criticism of Hamas put me off.
Also Larissa Waters using the hashtag#ibelievewomen. I have been arguing this week with two women friends who embraced it literally to mean that not a single woman would lie about rape. It took a lot of energy to budge then from that delusional stance. That is why using the hashtag is irresponsible regardless of what Waters means.