Comment on Implementing Portable User Identities with DIDs
Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
I don’t like LLMs either, but I think its harsh to just close the discussion because someone used an LLM to rephrase someone’s initial idea…
Comment on Implementing Portable User Identities with DIDs
Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
I don’t like LLMs either, but I think its harsh to just close the discussion because someone used an LLM to rephrase someone’s initial idea…
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 days ago
I mean, sure, but LLM issues are currently plaguing open source projects. Curl, for example: gist.github.com/…/07f7581f6e3d78ef37dfbfc81fd1d1c…
If someone isn’t passionate about something enough to write their own request, why would the devs be passionate about implementing it?
Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Wow that was an amusing read, but not really comparable. Those are automated AI security findings, hallucinated partially. But this is an idea that was phrased out by using AI. He already showed the passion to submit and discuss his idea, what you are doing is valuing the devs passion more than someone that’s clearly not a dev submitting his idea … It sounds a little elitist to me.
AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 days ago
The problem is the github issue has hallucinations and incorrect technical terminology. It really shouldn’t be used for this purpose, it’s pretty selfish to expect maintainers to consider something that you used LLM for in my opinion. I don’t think that’s elitist, is it really all that difficult to write a feature request on your own, especially if you’ve already done the hard part (the research)?
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I did the research I looked at many different way to get the desired solution. I learned how ATProto works i looked into other services with did got an llm to put those ideas in the required format for the issue. Can you please point out the hallucinations in the issue so i can go and fix them