Comment on Implementing Portable User Identities with DIDs

Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  No thats the whole point of a DID. Its an existing standard that has been established to manage decentralised identity. Their exists multiple ways to handle it so a did is did:source:id where the source can be many different things blue-sky uses a group of trusted identity server, but u can use a selhosted file, the blocckchain all sorts of things

  source

  • SpookyMulder@twun.io ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The way this comment is written doesn’t sound anything like the OP or the GitHub issue. Different tone, different dialect/spelling… lot of linguistic red flags. Not that I’m judging either way, it’s just suspicious how vastly different they are.

    source

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      yeah it has the telltale tone and structure of a tool that a lot of us hate yk, reply seems to be human though?

      source
    • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      im lazy i used llm to write issue and post.

      source
  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    ah yeah that makes sense

    source