Comment on A Fediverse Permaculture
abeorch@friendica.ginestes.es 1 day ago@JohnnyEnzyme Yeah I was using a cliche term (but I see it so often where some people seem to want to do grand 'performantive charity' and then very quickly get angry and disillusioned when they don't get the validation back for their efforts (which are quite grand to be fair) - To be clear that's not all people.
I think people almost always mean well - and of course those public instances were needed to get things off the ground but I'm going to say that I'd rather see that they eventually die off as smaller servers become easier to run and people actually have personal connections with whoever runs the server they are using (ideally themselves)
I actually find legal structures like Trusts and Charities less than ideal. I know they exist for a reason and have a purpose but the structure of the relationship between the parties is weird - the giver of charity and the recipient - I prefer coops and mutual exchanges and engagements
JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 22 hours ago
Fair enough, and I think I'm mostly in agreement with you.
I've seen it speculated (or opined) that this tends to be where things are headed, based on the state of coming tech, ease of use, and current models. Something like that, anyway.