No, absolutely not. None of your arguments hold any water. There are reasonable arguments that convictions should be public information, but not arrests. If anything, your arguments further prove that arrests SHOULDN'T be public information
No, absolutely not. None of your arguments hold any water. There are reasonable arguments that convictions should be public information, but not arrests. If anything, your arguments further prove that arrests SHOULDN'T be public information
pfwood178@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Yeah, that guy’s arguments are invalid - you don’t need to know that Juan from down the block got picked up on suspicion of DUI and spent the night in lockup.
The only reason arrest records SHOULD be public is so the police can’t simply “disappear” Juan from down the block.
ಠ_ಠ