dumbass@leminal.space 5 days ago
Yeah we would, it’s the end product not the production that defines it. Same way we refer to cars as cars even tho there’s been robots building them for decades.
dumbass@leminal.space 5 days ago
Yeah we would, it’s the end product not the production that defines it. Same way we refer to cars as cars even tho there’s been robots building them for decades.
pocker_machine@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I understand we would. I just left a shower thought on the possibility that an entity, if exists, called God would. Not trying to be pedantic here, just an amusing thought. 🙂
squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 days ago
That point quickly devolves into “What would a hypothetical being that’s completely different from us and not knowable do?”
Or to put it differently: “What would something we can’t understand be like?”
It’s kind of a moot question to ask since the question already defines that there is no answer.
pocker_machine@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Interesting. Yes we are reducing the not knowable to knowable, which is moot.
dumbass@leminal.space 5 days ago
Sall good, I was just stoned replying.