Sometimes, sometimes it isn’t. Specifically what would you have charged him with, and what evidence would have convicted him?
Sometimes, sometimes it isn’t. Specifically what would you have charged him with, and what evidence would have convicted him?
dudinax@programming.dev 1 year ago
Crimes against the peace. The evidence is he started a war in Iraq. It’s not complicated.
merc@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yes, it is. Merely starting a war isn’t justification for prosecution in the ICC. That’s not how the laws work.