Sometimes, sometimes it isn’t. Specifically what would you have charged him with, and what evidence would have convicted him?
Sometimes, sometimes it isn’t. Specifically what would you have charged him with, and what evidence would have convicted him?
dudinax@programming.dev 9 months ago
Crimes against the peace. The evidence is he started a war in Iraq. It’s not complicated.
merc@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Yes, it is. Merely starting a war isn’t justification for prosecution in the ICC. That’s not how the laws work.