Comment

Comment on Exposing docker socket to a container

glizzyguzzler@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

So I've found that if you use the user: option with a user: UserName it requires the container to have that UserName alsoo inside. If you do it with a UID/GID, it maps the container's default user (likely root 0) to the UID/GID you provide user: 1500:1500. For many containers it just works, for linuxserver (a group that produces containers for stuff) containers I think it biffs it - those are way jacked up. I put the containers that won't play ball in a LXC container (via Incus GUI), or for simple permission fixes I just make a permissions-fixing version of the container (runs as root, but only executes commands I provide) to fill a volume with the data that has the right permissions then load that volume into the container. Luckily jellyfin doesn't need that.

I give jellyfin read-only access (via :ro in the volumes:) to my media stuff because it doesn't need to write to it. I think it's fine if your use-case needs :rw, keep a backup (even if you :ro!).

Here's my docker-compose.yml, I gave jellyfin its own IP with macvlan. It's pretty janky and I'm still working it, but you can have jellyfin use your server's IP by deleting everything after jellyfin-nw: (but keepjellyfin-nw:!) in both the networks: section and services: section. Delete the mac: in the services: section too. In the ports: part that 10.0.1.69 would be the IP of your server (or in this case, what I declare the jellyfin container's IP to be) - it makes it so the container can only bind to the IP you provide, otherwise it can bind to anything the server has access to (as far as I understand).

And of course, I have GPU acceleration working here with some embeded Intel iGPU. Hope this helps!

# --- NETWORKS ---
networks:
  jellyfin-nw:
    # In docker, `macvlan` gets similar stuff to 
    driver: macvlan
    driver_opts:
        parent: 'br0'
    #    mode: 'l2'
    name: 'doc0'
    ipam:
        config:
          - subnet: "10.0.1.0/24"
            gateway: "10.0.1.1"

# --- SERVICES ---
services:
    jellyfin:
        container_name: jellyfin
        image: ghcr.io/jellyfin/jellyfin:latest
        environment:
          - TZ=America/Los_Angeles
          - JELLYFIN_PublishedServerUrl=https://jellyfin.guzzlezone.local
        ports:
          - '10.0.1.69:8096:8096/tcp'
          - '10.0.1.69:7359:7359/udp'
          - '10.0.1.69:1900:1900/udp'
        devices:
          - '/dev/dri/renderD128:/dev/dri/renderD128'
        #  - '/dev/dri/card0:/dev/dri/card0'
        volumes:
          - '/mnt/ssd/jellyfin/config:/config:rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,Z'
          - '/mnt/cache/jellyfin/log:/config/log:rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,Z'
          - '/mnt/cache/jellyfin/cache:/cache:rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,Z'
          - '/mnt/cache/jellyfin/config-cache:/config/cache:rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,Z'
          # Media links below
          - '/mnt/spinner/movies:/data/movies:ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,z'
          - '/mnt/spinner/shows:/data/shows:ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,z'
          - '/mnt/spinner/music:/data/music:ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,z'
        restart: unless-stopped
        # Security stuff
        read_only: true
        tmpfs:
          - /tmp:uid=2200,gid=2200,rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev
        # mac address is 02:42 then 10.0.1.69 in hex for each # betwen the .s mapped to the :s in the mac address
        # its how docker assigns so there will never be a mac address collision
        mac_address: 02:42:0A:00:01:45
        networks:
            jellyfin-nw:
                # Docker is pretty jacked up and can't get an IP via DHCP so manually specify it
                ipv4_address: 10.0.1.69
        user: 2200:2200
        # gpu capability needs render capability, see the # for your server with `getent group render | cut -d: -f3`
        group_add:
          - "109"
        security_opt:
          - no-new-privileges:true
        cap_drop:
          - ALL

source

Sort:hotnew top

5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
I have set all this up on my Asustor NAS, therefore things like apt install are not applicable in my use-case. Nevertheless, thank you very much for your time and expertise with regards to users and volumes. What is your strategy for networks in general? Do you setup a separate network for each and every container unless the services have to communicate with each other? I am not sure I understand your network setup in the Jellyfin container.

In the ports: part that 10.0.1.69 would be the IP of your server (or in this case, what I declare the jellyfin container’s IP to be) - it makes it so the container can only bind to the IP you provide, otherwise it can bind to anything the server has access to (as far as I understand). With the macvlan driver the virtual network driver of your container behaves like its own physical network interface which you can assign a separate IP to, right? What advantage does this have exactly or what potential problems does this solve?

source
- glizzyguzzler@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  I wanted Jellyfin on its own IP so I could think about implementing VLANs. I havent yet, and I’m not sure what I did is even needed. But I did do it! You very likely don’t need to do it.
  
  There are likely guides on enabling Jellyfin hardware acceleration on your Asustor NAS - so just follow them!
  
  I do try to set up separate networks for each service.
  
  On one server I have a monolithic docker compose file with a ton of networks defined to keep services from talking to the internet or each other if it’s not useful (pdf converter is prevented from talking to the internet or the Authentik database, for example). Makes the most sense here, has the most power.
  
  On this server I have each service split up with its own docker compose file. The network bit makes more sense on services that have an external database and other bits, it lets me set it up so only the service can talk to its database and its database cannot reach the internet at large (via adding a ‘internal: true’ to the networks: section). In this case, yes the pdf converter can talk to other services and I’d need to block its internet access at the router somehow.
  
  The monolithic method gets more annoying to deal with with many services via virtue of a gigantic docker compose file and the up/down time (esp. for services that don’t acknowledge shutdown commands). But it lets me use fine-grained networking within the docker compose file.
  
  For each service on its own, they expose a port and things talk to them from there. So instead of an internal docker network letting Authentik talk to a service, Authentik just looks up the address of the service. I don’t notice any difference in perceptible lag.
  
  source
  - 5ymm3trY@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
    I am a strong believer in separate docker compose files to keep it more organized and hopefully have more control over everything. But in the end most of it comes down to personal preference.
    
    I actually have some kind of network issues with one of my containers at the moment (Adguard in this case), where your ideas already came in handy. Unfortunately, I couldn’t solve it yet, but this is also something for a new topic I believe.
    
    source