Comment on The proletarianization of tech workers
nodsocket@lemmy.world 1 year agoWould you say that the only people who are not proletariat are those who are “financially independent” in the sense that they don’t need to work for an income?
Comment on The proletarianization of tech workers
nodsocket@lemmy.world 1 year agoWould you say that the only people who are not proletariat are those who are “financially independent” in the sense that they don’t need to work for an income?
Not_mikey@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, I’d say that “financially independent” really means your dependent on capitalism, and that dependency will lead you to defend capitalism from any challenges. That is the bourgeois position and puts you against the proletariat. Their are other classes though besides proletariat and bourgeoisie with different relations to capital. Petite bourgeoisie are neither bourgeoisie nor proletariat but there interests align with the bourgeoisie/capital and against the proletariat, but they are not completely dependent on capitalism so they won’t defend it as zealously. There is also the independent worker class who work for themselves outside a corporate structure, eg. An independent farmer, whose interests don’t align with either the bourgeoisie or proletariat.