Comment on š Boost for Lemmy 1.0.20 - PieFed Support
cm0002@piefed.world āØ4ā© āØhoursā© agoBooo, Boost is great and absolutely worth the couple bucks, that goes to a solo dev.
Comment on š Boost for Lemmy 1.0.20 - PieFed Support
cm0002@piefed.world āØ4ā© āØhoursā© agoBooo, Boost is great and absolutely worth the couple bucks, that goes to a solo dev.
artyom@piefed.social āØ3ā© āØhoursā© ago
You can send your bucks to these devs too, without sending 30% of it to support Google.
cm0002@piefed.world āØ2ā© āØhoursā© ago
He has an alternative donation platform. If you contact him, he might be open to giving you an APK if you donate through that. Orr you could just donate through that and install an "acquired" APK. Orr just donate through that and block ads system wide with an APK installed through a proxied store (e.g. Aurora Store). For the longest time I didn't even realize boost had ads because of my ad blocking LMAO
Boost is a native UI, both Voyager and Blorp (While visually appealing) are just web wrappers and I absolutely despise web wrapper "apps". Boost also beats Voyager in customization (won't comment on Blorp, never tried Blorp)
artyom@piefed.social āØ2ā© āØhoursā© ago
What's the difference?
cm0002@piefed.world āØ1ā© āØhourā© ago
WebApps are just...so laggy, Voyager is prob the least laggy React app I've ever seen...but there're still noticeable points where it is
Native UIs, while not entirely immune to lag, is tons better and generally use far less resources to achieve it
For a technical difference:
Voyager/Blorp use React which is basically JavaScript and typically requires the app to ship with everything needed to run JavaScript. Each app runs a "mini-browser". Though it has its pros because you only need to develop one app for all platforms.
Native UIs use the UI elements provided by the OS and each platform you release the app on must be developed separately, but it can also be optimized with less effort and less resources.