How do you know they often aren’t? I’m an academic and regularly use wikipedia to find citations for sources. I’ve have yet to come across any citations that weren’t wrong.
How do you know they often aren’t? I’m an academic and regularly use wikipedia to find citations for sources. I’ve have yet to come across any citations that weren’t wrong.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Because I see the things they’re getting from Wikipedia and I am them, and they admit they didn’t actually check the sources.
How would you determine that a cited source was wrong?
crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
I’ll click on them and then read them.
Here are two pages I’ve gone through a lot I can verify have correct citations in them. In fact, one of the citations in one of these is my research! which I know for certain was cited correctly.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse
…m.wikipedia.org/…/Free_and_open-source_software
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
And how will that allow you to know if they’re right or not?
pfizer_dose@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Post-truther detected.
crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Then I read them and use my critical thinking skills. For research I put trust in peer review articles by reputable journals.
But regardless,
Isn’t that a broader question as to what we consider truth and not something specific to wikipedia ?
pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Subject matter experts do still exist. They’re dying off, and it’s unclear how many more we intend to create. But we do still have some.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
You can’t be a subject matter expert on everything though?