Comment

Comment on Enough of the billionaires and their big tech. ‘Frugal tech’ will build us all a better world

Love how it highlights that big tech (much to capitalism’s fault, TBH) can only drive innovation if the tech has a moat around it, if no one else can, or would, copy it and deploy it at a lower cost.

Which is… the argument that people use to defend capitalism? That capitalism drives innovation and makes it accessible to everyone at the lowest possible price.

I like the frugal tech idea as much as I like degrowth.

source

Sort:hotnew top

unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
“Capitalism creates innovation!”
The innovation:

Image

source
eldebryn@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
That’s basically saying that “big tech” (as we know it today) and competition-friendly capitalism just cannot coexist. Which I’m inclined to agree with.

source
- MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  There’s no reason you couldn’t have people grow a new Internet that isn’t reliant on AWS and cloud flare and other big tech stuff, it’s just that it’s much easier to do that since it’s already there. And you still have the problems with spammers even if you try to move away from capitalism.
  
  source
  - Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Is that really true though? Like there’s no reason I could be president except for the massive amount of connections and funding is need that effectively means it is not possible for me to be effective. (Nussbaum or Sen would say this is not about actual capability.)
    
    I certainly think we could grow a new internet, but there is so much culture and forces pushing against this, that it may not be actually possible with addressing the systemic forces first.
    
    Not to say we should do nothing (similar to recycling — we should do what we can as individuals, but it’s somewhat moot as long as industrial processes continue as they are now). We should do what we can and work toward a better vision.
    
    source
rottingleaf@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Frugal tech idea and degrowth are more capitalist than a handful of monopolies owning you in every orifice and billing you for it.

If by “capitalism” we don’t mean paleo-industrialism of XIX-century aristocrats with monocles and child labor. If we do mean the “free market with protections for property, rights, safety and anti-monopoly regulations yadda-yadda” moderate-normal-classical model.

source