Where I work, my skip-levels have started debating on whether they want to consider if an engineer uses AI as a factor for reviews, pay raises and incentives, and are tracking who uses it by way of licenses.
It's a bit ridiculous IMO because they're essentially saying "we don't care if slop makes it into the code base, so long as you are using AI, you will remain gainfully employed."
Serinus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
It’s useful for things I’d otherwise Google. It makes a great ORM, when you know exactly what you want to do with a lot of mundane code. And it’s so much better than adding a framework for an ORM.
Feyd@programming.dev 8 months ago
I don’t like ORMs, but I’d rather use a battle tested ORM than some vibe coded data layer.
Serinus@lemmy.world 8 months ago
You know, you can just look at it. It’s pretty simple, easy to look at, pretty repetitive code where it’s generally pretty easy to spot if something’s wrong.
Vibe coding is more hitting “accept all” and not looking at it at all (or not knowing how to look at it).
Feyd@programming.dev 8 months ago
Or, I could just write it myself, instead of ending up like these guys sketch.dev/…/our-first-outage-from-llm-written-co…