Comment on Australian Labor government threatens Signal encrypted messaging system
Tenderizer@aussie.zone 1 week ago
There’s a legitimate argument to be had about privacy vs. safety. The police need information to investigate crimes, complete privacy means all crimes go unsolved. It should absolutely require the police put in some legwork, law enforcement shouldn’t be able to be automated, but where in-between the two extremes you draw the line on this issue is subjective.
I don’t want the government to have all the information, and I do want the government to be able to enforce the law. VPN’s are probably where I draw the line, private access to information is a red-line for me. Signal chat is a grey area for me, because it is also a means of accessing information but privacy of association is not something I consider to be important enough for the risks to public safety.
recklessengagement@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Damn, good thing the internet came along. Crazt how no crimes were ever solved before then, and detectives just sat around hoping people would turn themselves in
Tenderizer@aussie.zone 1 week ago
Were they ever solved?
notgold@aussie.zone 1 week ago
From page 25 there is crime clearance rates in Australia for the 2 decades before the internet. Looks like crime was solved before the internet existed.
aic.gov.au/…/size-crime-problem-australia-january…
Tenderizer@aussie.zone 1 week ago
Higher than I thought honestly. I thought it was like 1/4 murders that were solved.