Comment on UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 day agowireguard is not undetectable, even wireshark has a simple way to identify it, but there are more accurate ways
Comment on UK households could face VPN 'ban' after use skyrockets following Online Safety Bill
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 day agowireguard is not undetectable, even wireshark has a simple way to identify it, but there are more accurate ways
derpgon@programming.dev 1 day ago
Wouldn’t it be detected via initial connection only? WG does not send packets while connected, does it?
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
update: I think not only the handshake packets contain a recognizable pattern. look at “Subsequent Messages: Exchange of Data Packets”
www.wireguard.com/protocol/
especially if the receiver/sender_index and the counter are what I think they are.
also have a look at this page: www.wireguard.com/known-limitations/
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
now that you say, I think I remember reading something like this earlier