Comment on Former Moderator Sues Chaturbate for 'Psychological Trauma'

SheeEttin@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• SammyJK@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Not only that, most of the article is behind a paywall

  source

  • HailSeitan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    This is literally the one site whose journalism every Lemming should support

    source
• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  But it is from the article and therefore relevant.

  source

  • Saffire@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    It might be slightly relevant but that doesn’t mean that the way you posted it wasn’t disingenuous. How does it being causally mentioned in the article make it relevant enough that it somehow became the entirety of the main body of your post?

    source

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      The fuck it was disingenuous. It’s the part of the article on which I had commentary. That it wasn’t the main focus does not say anything about my motivation to criticize people having the wrong take / solution.

      source

      • Saffire@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Hmm, you’re right. I suppose disingenuous was the wrong word for me to use and for that I apologize. It just seems a little strange to me to title your post about one thing, but then in the body all you reference is an off handed mention the article makes about something that is barely tangentially related to the article. I don’t know what to call it, but I guess technically you weren’t disingenuous.

        source

        • -> View More Comments